this is what i appear to be this week. i have income, but am not working. it's a lovely state full of sweet smells and flights of fancy, but it's not going to last, and it's going to get old even sooner. the phrase, however, is amusing in the fact that it actually exists as a real condition of existence.
anyway. i'm feeling a bit spastic today. why? partly because i was going to spend today working on my story and cleaning my apartment but am instead spending it working on a try-out project, which entertaining though it may be is not part of my original task list and has thus expanded my task list beyond my available time.
i've take a break from my project now for about a half hour. I've been playing backgammon with some stranger over the microsoft game zone network. i'm not convinced this is a good scenario for me to engage in. I find myself always assigning intentions and moods to my opponents. Some of this is warranted: a player, whoever they may be, who takes your piece at nearly every opportunity even when the risks fall mostly to them is an aggressive player; one who will not take a peice unless they can do so with absolute security is a defensive player. Where it starts getting unhealthy for me is when more interactive actions come into play. Resignations that are not accepted despite when the game is absolutely lost. In this last game, I decided I needed to get through the match quickly to get back to work (which I'm clearly doing...), so I did something I usually refrain from - i doubled the odds when I had a clear advantage. My opponent accepted. In the next round, I double the odds again, though the odds were matched, with the idea that if I won, the match would be completed. Completeness is important. It's a gesture of good sportmanship. After this, I did obtain a clear lead for a while, then my opponent pulled ahead with two consecutive rolls of double-6s. I sent the message "nice roll" to which I received no response. At this point we were both safely on our own side of the board. From that point on, the game was extremely close. before the last three rolls, we both had two pieces at 5 and two at 4. My opponent rolled 4,5 leaving 2 pieces to my 4. I rolled double-5s and won the match.
As I completed my move, fully intending to close with "Good Game," I saw that my opponent had already left me a message:
"You're welcome"
My "Good Game" went through
Opponent responded "It was luck"
Flabbergasted at this use of stock phrases to execute a spectacular display of poor sportsmanship, I hesitated only momentarily before responding
"No"
and leaving.
Recent Comments